02gt
Well-Known Member
had a great time :rock:
The black on silver looks sexy as ****.....nice work clean and simple.....
had a great time :rock:
The black on silver looks sexy as ****.....nice work clean and simple.....
The black on silver looks sexy as ****.....nice work clean and simple.....
That car is going to be sik once he get the whippled tune on it...
I had a great time. Not to be a party pooper, but I think these numbers were closer to a dynojet than a mustang dyno. 301 on this dyno would put me at 350 to 355 on a dynojet and over 400 at the crank.
I had a great time. Not to be a party pooper, but I think these numbers were closer to a dynojet than a mustang dyno. 301 on this dyno would put me at 350 to 355 on a dynojet and over 400 at the crank.
The way I understood it was that with the Mustang dyno the #'s were low by 15% so then you would add another 15% to get your flywheel HP correct me if I am wrong but Like G man said that would mean close to 380 ish at the fly
you mean 337 if you put down 301rwhp.. What are your mods... And remember all dynos are going to be different.. Just make sure to use the same one for all your different mods.. That way you know if your getting better or worst..
Mods that would affect numbers are intake/tune, UDP and hi-flow cats.
Emilio, do you mean.... 1.2? because 1.2% is only like 3 HP difference....
Example:
TBSS 324*1.2%=327.88HP
or
TBSS*1.2= 388.8 HP
Just as a reference, the TBSS is rated at 395 crank HP....so going with 324*1.2=388.8 is pretty close.....
E, I am just saying that it isnt 1.2%..... it is just 1.2 or 1.15 that is all.....the numbers are no where close when you use the %....just so people dont use that is all...
Gib
samething quite confusing folks..